FOTJ and ROTS must die

Soon, all will accept 'An Ally Turns Away'. They will join us, or die, Master.

Here's proof:

The titles of Episode I and IV are somewhat similar. 'A New Hope' and 'The Phantom Menace' are both titles where there is a deeper meaning related to them. You will have to watch both the movies in order to find out what the titles mean. Also, neither the good guys nor the bad guys are mentioned in either title.

You will find the same similarities in Episode II and V. Just by looking at the title 'The Empire Strikes Back', you know that the Empire will attack the Rebellion before even seeing the movie. 'Attack Of The Clones' is the same. We already know that there will be clones in the movie, and that they're gonna attack. We also know that the movie will take place during the Clone Wars. Also, in both the movies, the bad guys are mentioned.

In Episode VI, 'Return Of The Jedi', the good guys are mentioned in the title, and the title has multiple meanings. It is clear that George Lucas will find a similar title for Episode III.

This clearly proves that the first, second and final installment of each trilogy has somthing in commun.

Also, to make the pattern more complicated, each sequence (I & IV, II & V, III & IV) are either opposed or equal to one another. Let me explain:

The 1st installment: In the title ANH, the New Hope is directly related to the victory for the Rebellions, while 'The Phantom Menace' is the mystery of the Sith. These titles are opposed to each other; Good and Bad. Grammatically they are also opposed; in Episode IV they have used the word 'a' while they have used the opposite word in Episode I: 'the'.

The 2nd installment: These two movies are similarities, not dissimilarities. They have used the word 'strike' in Episode V, and the word 'attack' in Episode II, as well as the bad guys being mentioned in both titles.

All of this has been done intentionally! I see it all to clearly now:

Episode I & IV: Titles have profound meanings, neither side is mentioned and titles are dissimilarities. Episode II & V: Titles have shallow meanings, bad guys are mentioned and titles are similarities.

And now...

Episode III & VI: Titles have multiple meanings, good guys are mentioned and titles are BOTH similarities and dissimilarities.

You see the pattern?

THIS EXCLUDES TITLES LIKE 'COLLAPSE OF THE REPUBLIC' AND 'RISE OF THE EMPIRE'

It cannot be 'Fall of The Jedi', because there cannot be the word 'Jedi' in two titles. Neither can there be 'Knightfall', because that means basically the same thing. The title has to be one with several possible meanings, and it has to mention the good guy(s); someone other than the Jedi.

Episode III & VI are similar because the good guy(s) is/are mentioned in both titles, and dissimilar because, once again, George Lucas likes to play with our minds. And this is where I tell you how I have reached my conclusion about the title of Episode III. Grammar is something George really likes to toy with. Episode II and Episode VI have rather similar titles:

Attack OF THE Clones Return OF THE Jedi <Noun> OF THE <Good guys or bad guys>

Episode V has the following title:

The Empire Strikes Back THE <Good guys or bad guys> <Verb> <Adverb>

The pattern is still the same, see? Just like Episode I and IV have only 3 words each in their titles.

Scroll a little for my personal opinion on what Episode III will be called.

STAR WARS Episode III AN ALLY TURNS AWAY

It all makes perfect sense. It could have multiple meanings, because the Republic has several allies, as has Palpatine. Someone are bound to change sides in the dark time that is Episode III. But most importantly, Anakin, who is an ally for the Jedi, will change sides too. The dissimilarities with this tiltle from Episode VI is that 'a' has replaced 'the' from 'The Empire Strikes Back', like between Episode I & IV. The verb 'Turn' has also replaced 'Return' from Episode VI.

And the grammar matches that of 'The Empire Strikes Back', just like it does in Episode I and IV and Episode II and V.

It's nice to have allies! (Unless they turn away) =)

But what of us AFFTEers? 'A Former Friend Turns Evil'.

Dude get out more!!

Thats not proof, thats a theory.

Regards, MJ

I absoltely agree with this person that I have never spoken with before!

EU rules, but you don't want to do that.

Also, I'd like to point out that I was the first person to suggest Revenge of the Sith (ROTS) as a title for EpIII, and even I now agree that AATA is a superior title! (You can check at groups.google.com if you don't beleive me)

Why, thank you, stranger :=J

A pattern, yes, but not that the title will be An Ally Turns Away.

The funny thing is, I can follow his reasoning he gets tothe part were he tried and explain how AATA fits the pattern, and other popular potenial titles do not.